Meyer v. Fidelity Savings
This text of 51 F.3d 900 (Meyer v. Fidelity Savings) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
John H. MEYER, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant,
v.
FIDELITY SAVINGS, et al., Defendants,
and
Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation,
Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee.
Nos. 89-16695, 90-16025.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
April 12, 1995.
On Remand from the United States Supreme Court.
Before: TANG, FARRIS and D.W. NELSON, Circuit Judges.
Prior Report: 114 S.Ct. 996
ORDER
The judgment of the district court is reversed and this cause is remanded to the district court for further proceedings in conformity with the opinion of the United States Supreme Court.
The defendant Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation is awarded costs in the amount of Two Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($2,500.00) expended in the prosecution of its case in the United States Supreme Court.
SO ORDERED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
51 F.3d 900, 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2665, 95 Daily Journal DAR 4613, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 8067, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meyer-v-fidelity-savings-ca9-1995.