Meyer, Hess & Co. v. Way

187 Ill. App. 67, 1914 Ill. App. LEXIS 615
Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided May 20, 1914·No. Gen. No. 18,904·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Mr. Justice Baume

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Sales, § 376*—rule as to when profits constitute measure of damages. Though ordinarily, where a vendor fails to comply with his contract to sell and deliver certain goods at a fixed price, the measure of damages in an action by the vendee is the difference between the contract price and the value of the goods in the market at the time and place of delivery, yet where the vendor knows that the vendee has an existing contract for a resale at an advanced price, and that the purchase is to fulfil such contract, and the vendor agrees to supply the goods to enable the vendee to perform his contract, profits which would accrue to the vendee upon performing the contract of resale may properly be said to have entered into the contemplation of the parties in making the contract, and such profits constitute a proper measure of damages.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Meyer, Hess & Co. v. Way, 187 Ill. App. 67, 1914 Ill. App. LEXIS 615 (Ill. Ct. App. 1914).

187 Ill. App. 67 (Meyer, Hess & Co. v. Way) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Supergear Drive Corp. v. Hollister-Whitney Co.
64 N.E.2d 672 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1945)
Nathan v. National Brush Co.
231 Ill. App. 246 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1924)