Metzenbaum v. Guzman

Ohio Supreme Court

Metzenbaum v. Guzman

884 N.E.2d 1100, 117 Ohio St. 3d 1466

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedApril 18, 2008

Docket2008-0339

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 884 N.E.2d 1100 (Metzenbaum v. Guzman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Metzenbaum v. Guzman, 884 N.E.2d 1100, 117 Ohio St. 3d 1466 (Ohio 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

Cuyahoga App. No. 90781, 2008-Ohio-56. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County. It appears from the records of this court that appellant has not filed a merit brief, due April 14, 2008, in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and therefore has failed to prosecute this cause with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration thereof,

It is ordered by the court that this cause is dismissed sua sponte.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cuyahoga App. No. 90781, 2008-Ohio-56. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County. It appears from the records of this court that appellant has not filed a merit brief, due April 14, 2008, in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and therefore has failed to prosecute this cause with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration thereof,

It is ordered by the court that this cause is dismissed sua sponte.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

884 N.E.2d 1100, 117 Ohio St. 3d 1466, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/metzenbaum-v-guzman-ohio-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack