Metz v. Georgia Public Utilities Corp.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Metz v. Georgia Public Utilities Corp.

184 S.E. 629, 52 Ga. App. 771, 1936 Ga. App. LEXIS 245

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided March 3, 1936·No. 24984·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

Broyles, O. J.

1. Where an appliance for heating water by gas, on private premises, is owned and controlled by the owner or occupant of the premises, a company which did not sell or install the appliance, but which merely furnished gas to it, is not responsible for the condition of the appliance, and is not liable to the owner or occupant for injuries caused by its defective condition, unless the gas is supplied by [772] the company, with actual knowledge on its part of the defective and dangerous condition of the appliance. See Hatcher v. Georgia Power Co., 40 Ga. App. 830 (151 S. E. 696); 12 R. C. L. 909, § 49; 25 A. L. R. 272; Bell v. Huntington Development & Gas Co., 106 W. Va. 155 (145 S. E. 165).

Decided March 3, 1936. Ringel & Ringel, Cowart & Cowart, for plaintiff. Reese, Scarlett, Bennet & Highsmith, John J. Gilbert, for defendant.

2. The amended petition, properly construed (most strongly against the plaintiff), shows that the “coil heater” (the alleged defect in which caused it to throw off carbon monoxide gas and injure the plaintiff who inhaled the gas) was in the plaintiff’s residence and owned and controlled by her; that the defendant company did not sell or install the heater, but merely supplied gas without actual knowledge of the alleged defective condition of the heater. Under the ruling stated in the preceding headnote, the petition failed to set out a' cause of action, and the court did not err in dismissing it on general demurrer.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre and Guerry, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, O. J.

1. Where an appliance for heating water by gas, on private premises, is owned and controlled by the owner or occupant of the premises, a company which did not sell or install the appliance, but which merely furnished gas to it, is not responsible for the condition of the appliance, and is not liable to the owner or occupant for injuries caused by its defective condition, unless the gas is supplied by [772] the company, with actual knowledge on its part of the defective and dangerous condition of the appliance. See Hatcher v. Georgia Power Co., 40 Ga. App. 830 (151 S. E. 696); 12 R. C. L. 909, § 49; 25 A. L. R. 272; Bell v. Huntington Development & Gas Co., 106 W. Va. 155 (145 S. E. 165).

Decided March 3, 1936. Ringel & Ringel, Cowart & Cowart, for plaintiff. Reese, Scarlett, Bennet & Highsmith, John J. Gilbert, for defendant.

2. The amended petition, properly construed (most strongly against the plaintiff), shows that the “coil heater” (the alleged defect in which caused it to throw off carbon monoxide gas and injure the plaintiff who inhaled the gas) was in the plaintiff’s residence and owned and controlled by her; that the defendant company did not sell or install the heater, but merely supplied gas without actual knowledge of the alleged defective condition of the heater. Under the ruling stated in the preceding headnote, the petition failed to set out a' cause of action, and the court did not err in dismissing it on general demurrer.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre and Guerry, JJ., concur.

Metz v. Georgia Public Utilities Corp., 184 S.E. 629, 52 Ga. App. 771, 1936 Ga. App. LEXIS 245 (Ga. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

184 S.E. 629 (Metz v. Georgia Public Utilities Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related