Metropolitan Savings Bank v. Tuttle

261 A.D. 1058, 26 N.Y.S.2d 846
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 10, 1941·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

There was no default and no cause of action for the foreclosure of the mortgage when the complaint was served. That defect was not cured by a supplemental complaint alleging a default which occurred thereafter.

The order should be reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion to dismiss the complaint and the supplemental complaint granted, without prejudice to the institution of a new action for the foreclosure of the mortgage.

Present — O’Malley, Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Cohn, JJ.

Order unanimously reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion to dismiss the complaint and the supplemental complaint granted, without prejudice to the institution of a new action for the foreclosure of the mortgage.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Metropolitan Savings Bank v. Tuttle, 261 A.D. 1058, 26 N.Y.S.2d 846 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

261 A.D. 1058 (Metropolitan Savings Bank v. Tuttle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Metropolitan Savings Bank v. Tuttle
264 A.D. 705 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1942)