Metropolitan Savings Bank v. Tuttle
This text of 261 A.D. 1058 (Metropolitan Savings Bank v. Tuttle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
There was no default and no cause of action for the foreclosure of the mortgage when the complaint was served. That defect was not cured by a supplemental complaint alleging a default which occurred thereafter.
The order should be reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion to dismiss the complaint and the supplemental complaint granted, without prejudice to the institution of a new action for the foreclosure of the mortgage.
Present — O’Malley, Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Cohn, JJ.
Order unanimously reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion to dismiss the complaint and the supplemental complaint granted, without prejudice to the institution of a new action for the foreclosure of the mortgage.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
261 A.D. 1058, 26 N.Y.S.2d 846, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/metropolitan-savings-bank-v-tuttle-nyappdiv-1941.