Metropolitan Savings Bank v. Tuttle
Opinion
There was no default and no cause of action for the foreclosure of the mortgage when the complaint was served. That defect was not cured by a supplemental complaint alleging a default which occurred thereafter.
The order should be reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion to dismiss the complaint and the supplemental complaint granted, without prejudice to the institution of a new action for the foreclosure of the mortgage.
Present — O’Malley, Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Cohn, JJ.
Order unanimously reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion to dismiss the complaint and the supplemental complaint granted, without prejudice to the institution of a new action for the foreclosure of the mortgage.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
261 A.D. 1058 (Metropolitan Savings Bank v. Tuttle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.