Metropolitan Savings Bank v. Tuttle
This text of 264 A.D. 705 (Metropolitan Savings Bank v. Tuttle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Order affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to the defendants-appellants to answer within ten days after service of order, on payment of said costs. No opinion. n
Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Dore and Callahan, JJ.; Dore and Callahan, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse and grant the motion; dissenting opinion by Dore, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
264 A.D. 705, 34 N.Y.S.2d 83, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/metropolitan-savings-bank-v-tuttle-nyappdiv-1942.