Home/Michigan Supreme Court/Metro v. AMWAY ASIA PACIFIC LTD.

Metro v. AMWAY ASIA PACIFIC LTD.

737 N.W.2d 758, 480 Mich. 868
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Metro v. AMWAY ASIA PACIFIC LTD.. Read the opinion of the Court — 477 Mich. 1031 →
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided September 12, 2007·No. 132318·Published

Opinion

737 N.W.2d 758 (2007)

Mark METRO, Robert F. Wardrop, II, Donald Turnwall, and Nancee L. Turnwall, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
AMWAY ASIA PACIFIC LTD., New AAP Limited, Stephen A. Van Andel, Richard M. Devos, Jr., Douglas L. Devos, and Goldman Sachs & Company, Defendants-Appellees.

Docket No. 132318. COA No. 258902.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

September 12, 2007.

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court's February 27, 2007 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Metro v. AMWAY ASIA PACIFIC LTD., 737 N.W.2d 758, 480 Mich. 868 (Mich. 2007).

737 N.W.2d 758 (Metro v. AMWAY ASIA PACIFIC LTD.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.