Metro v. AMWAY ASIA PACIFIC LTD.
This text of 727 N.W.2d 622 (Metro v. AMWAY ASIA PACIFIC LTD.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Mark METRO, Robert F. Wardrop, II, Donald Turnwall, and Nancee L. Turnwall, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
AMWAY ASIA PACIFIC LTD., New AAP Limited, Stephen A. Van Andel, Richard M. Devos, Jr., Douglas L. Devos, and Goldman Sachs & Company, Defendants-Appellees.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the motion for miscellaneous relief is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the July 20, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The conditional motion to include issue not raised in the application for leave to appeal is DENIED as moot.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
727 N.W.2d 622, 477 Mich. 1031, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/metro-v-amway-asia-pacific-ltd-mich-2007.