Metro v. AMWAY ASIA PACIFIC LTD.

727 N.W.2d 622, 477 Mich. 1031
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided February 27, 2007·No. 132318·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

727 N.W.2d 622 (2007)

Mark METRO, Robert F. Wardrop, II, Donald Turnwall, and Nancee L. Turnwall, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
AMWAY ASIA PACIFIC LTD., New AAP Limited, Stephen A. Van Andel, Richard M. Devos, Jr., Douglas L. Devos, and Goldman Sachs & Company, Defendants-Appellees.

Docket No. 132318. COA No. 258902.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

February 27, 2007.

On order of the Court, the motion for miscellaneous relief is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the July 20, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The conditional motion to include issue not raised in the application for leave to appeal is DENIED as moot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Metro v. AMWAY ASIA PACIFIC LTD., 727 N.W.2d 622, 477 Mich. 1031 (Mich. 2007).

727 N.W.2d 622 (Metro v. AMWAY ASIA PACIFIC LTD.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Detroit School District v. Urs Corporation
727 N.W.2d 622 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2007)