Metcalf v. . Ratcliff

1 S.E.2d 565, 215 N.C. 243, 1939 N.C. LEXIS 241
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedMarch 8, 1939
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 1 S.E.2d 565 (Metcalf v. . Ratcliff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Metcalf v. . Ratcliff, 1 S.E.2d 565, 215 N.C. 243, 1939 N.C. LEXIS 241 (N.C. 1939).

Opinion

Stacy, C. J.

The trial court evidently overlooked the fact that in each case the plaintiffs are seeking to revive and to have the balance due on their judgment fixed and established as well as to subject certain lands to its payment. Whether the complaints, to the extent that they may be regarded as bills of discovery, Jackson v. Thompson, 214 N. C., 539, were properly dismissed, need not now be determined, as it is necessary to reverse the nonsuit on the first ground. Perhaps upon a further hearing, the facts will be more fully developed.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Metcalf v. . Ratcliff
4 S.E.2d 515 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1939)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 S.E.2d 565, 215 N.C. 243, 1939 N.C. LEXIS 241, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/metcalf-v-ratcliff-nc-1939.