Metallizing Engineering Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Metallizing Engineering Co. v. United States

38 Cust. Ct. 458

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Metallizing Engineering Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 36 Cust. Ct. 205 →

United States Customs Court·Decided April 10, 1957·No. No. 60619; protests 247671-K, etc. (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Lawbence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of parts of metal-spray gun machines the same in all material respects as those the 'subject of Metallizing Engineering Co., Inc. v. United States (36 Cust. Ct. 205, C. D. 1775), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Metallizing Engineering Co. v. United States, 38 Cust. Ct. 458 (cusc 1957).

Pincite

38 Cust. Ct. 458 (Metallizing Engineering Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related