Metallizing Engineering Co. v. United States
34 Cust. Ct. 417
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Metallizing Engineering Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 36 Cust. Ct. 205 →
United States Customs Court·Decided June 23, 1955·No. No. 59182; protest 220049-K (New York)·Published
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of parts, wholly or in chief value of metal, for metal spraying machines, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Metallizing Engineering Co. v. United States, 34 Cust. Ct. 417 (cusc 1955).
34 Cust. Ct. 417 (Metallizing Engineering Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.