Mesquita v. Briarcliff Realty Co.
208 A.D. 753
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 15, 1924
StatusPublished
This text of 208 A.D. 753 (Mesquita v. Briarcliff Realty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Mesquita v. Briarcliff Realty Co., 208 A.D. 753 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1924).
Opinion
Award unanimously affirmed, with costs in favor of the State Industrial Board, on the authority of Emmick v. Hanrahan Brick & Ice Co. (206 App. Div. 580); Madura v. Bronx Parkway Commission (Id. 598); Cudahy Co. v. Parramore (263 U. S. 418, decided by United States Supreme Court Dee. 10, 1923).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cudahy Packing Co. Of Nebraska v. Parramore
263 U.S. 418 (Supreme Court, 1924)
Emmick v. Hanrahan Brick & Ice Co.
206 A.D. 580 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1923)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
208 A.D. 753, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mesquita-v-briarcliff-realty-co-nyappdiv-1924.