Mesquita v. Briarcliff Realty Co.

208 A.D. 753

Opinion

Award unanimously affirmed, with costs in favor of the State Industrial Board, on the authority of Emmick v. Hanrahan Brick & Ice Co. (206 App. Div. 580); Madura v. Bronx Parkway Commission (Id. 598); Cudahy Co. v. Parramore (263 U. S. 418, decided by United States Supreme Court Dee. 10, 1923).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mesquita v. Briarcliff Realty Co., 208 A.D. 753 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1924).

208 A.D. 753 (Mesquita v. Briarcliff Realty Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cudahy Packing Co. Of Nebraska v. Parramore
263 U.S. 418 (Supreme Court, 1924)
Emmick v. Hanrahan Brick & Ice Co.
206 A.D. 580 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1923)