Mertens v. Mertens
688 So. 2d 1155, 96 La.App. 3 Cir. 392, 1996 La. App. LEXIS 2368, 1996 WL 577887
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Mertens v. Mertens. Read the opinion of the Court — 688 So. 2d 1148 →
Opinion
For the reasons assigned in the case of Lettie Doris Mertens v. Daniel F. Mertens, 96-391 (La.App. 3 Cir. 10/09/96); 688 So.2d 1148, which was consolidated with this case, the trial court’s judgment is reversed in part, affirmed in part and rendered.
Costs of this appeal are assessed equally against Doris Mertens and Daniel Mertens.
REVERSED IN PART; AFFIRMED IN PART; AND RENDERED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mertens v. Mertens, 688 So. 2d 1155, 96 La.App. 3 Cir. 392, 1996 La. App. LEXIS 2368, 1996 WL 577887 (La. Ct. App. 1996).
688 So. 2d 1155 (Mertens v. Mertens) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mertens v. Mertens
688 So. 2d 1148 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1996)