Merrill v. Merrill
This text of 126 Mass. 228 (Merrill v. Merrill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Under the circumstances in evidence, the testimony that the libeEee had said that she “ could not have connection with any man ” would warrant the inference that she meant that she was physically incapable of such connection, and, if so understood, would, taken together with the other evidence in the case, justify a finding that she was impotent, as charged in the libel. The presiding judge having ruled otherwise as matter of law, without passing upon the question of fact, the ruling is a subject of exception. Nourse v. Henshaw, 123 Mass. 96.
Exceptions sustained.
At April term 1879, the case was heard by the Chief Justice upon the same evidence, and the Ebel dismissed
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
126 Mass. 228, 1879 Mass. LEXIS 213, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/merrill-v-merrill-mass-1879.