Merrill v. Merrill

126 Mass. 228, 1879 Mass. LEXIS 213
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided January 16, 1879·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

Under the circumstances in evidence, the testimony that the libeEee had said that she “ could not have connection with any man ” would warrant the inference that she meant that she was physically incapable of such connection, and, if so understood, would, taken together with the other evidence in the case, justify a finding that she was impotent, as charged in the libel. The presiding judge having ruled otherwise as matter of law, without passing upon the question of fact, the ruling is a subject of exception. Nourse v. Henshaw, 123 Mass. 96.

Exceptions sustained.

At April term 1879, the case was heard by the Chief Justice upon the same evidence, and the Ebel dismissed

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Merrill v. Merrill, 126 Mass. 228, 1879 Mass. LEXIS 213 (Mass. 1879).

126 Mass. 228 (Merrill v. Merrill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stepanek v. Stepanek
193 Cal. App. 2d 760 (California Court of Appeal, 1961)
M v. M
172 N.E.2d 240 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1961)
Anonymous
158 N.Y.S. 51 (New York Supreme Court, 1916)
Dix v. Atkins
128 Mass. 43 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1879)