M v. M

172 N.E.2d 240, 342 Mass. 773, 1961 Mass. LEXIS 849
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided February 7, 1961·Published

Opinion

Decree affirmed. The judge entered a decree nisi on the husband’s [774]*774libel for divorce on the ground of the impotency of his wife (G. L. [Ter. Ed.] c. 208, § 1). He dismissed the wife’s petition for separate support. The wife has appealed from both decrees. The evidence is reported. The parties were married November 3, 1957. The libel for divorce was filed October 8,1959. The judge was dearly justified in finding that, unknown to the husband at the time of the marriage, the wife because of congenital physical abnormalities was incapable of copulation. See S-v. S-, 192 Mass. 194; Merrill v. Merrill, 126 Mass. 228; Mutter v. Mutter, 123 Ky. 754; Fehr v. Fehr, 92 N. J. Eq. 316; Singer v. Singer, 9 N. J. Super. 397, 400; Donati v. Church, 13 N. J. Super. 454. The condition is incurable. Reed v. Reed, 26 Tenn. App. 690, 693. Singer v. Singer, supra. The principle of condonation or ratification is not applicable. Fehr v. Fehr, supra; but see Donati v. Church, 13 N. J. Super. 454, 457.

Max Singer, (S. Boy Bemar with him,) for the libellee. Nyman H. Kolodny, (Daniel J. Connors with him,) for the libellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

M v. M, 172 N.E.2d 240, 342 Mass. 773, 1961 Mass. LEXIS 849 (Mass. 1961).

172 N.E.2d 240 (M v. M) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Reed v. Reed
177 S.W.2d 26 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1943)
Merrill v. Merrill
126 Mass. 228 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1879)
S v. S
192 Mass. 194 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1906)
Mutter v. Mutter
97 S.W. 393 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1906)