Merrett v. Moore

77 F.3d 1304, 1996 WL 79404
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided February 26, 1996·No. No. 93-2510·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, KRAVITCH, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES and BARKETT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The Court having been polled at the request of one of the members of the Court and a majority of the Circuit Judges who are in regular active service not having voted in favor of it (Rule 35, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; 'Eleventh Circuit Rule 35-5), the Suggestion of Rehearing En Banc is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Merrett v. Moore, 77 F.3d 1304, 1996 WL 79404 (11th Cir. 1996).

77 F.3d 1304 (Merrett v. Moore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Rodriguez
722 N.E.2d 429 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 2000)
Merrett v. Moore
77 F.3d 1304 (Eleventh Circuit, 1996)