Meroney v. . Avery

64 N.C. 312
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Meroney v. . Avery. Read the opinion of the Court — 64 N.C. 312
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided January 5, 1870·Published

Opinion

Upon the trial, the plaintiff was introduced and testified, without objection, as to a conversation between himself and the testator in regard to the cause of action; upon his cross-examination he was asked if he were not plaintiff, and if Isaac T. Avery, the testator of the defendant, were not dead. Upon his answering in the affirmative, the defendant objected to the competency of his evidence as to the conversation.

His Honor held that all objection had been waived, and refused to exclude it.

Afterwards the defendant testified in regard to the same conversation.

Verdict for the plaintiff. Rule, etc. Judgment and Appeal.

(313) The plaintiff was an incompetent witness to any transaction or communication with the testator of the defendant: C.C.P. § 343;Whitesides v. Green, Admr., ante 307: but the objection was waived, by not being taken in due time. An objection must be taken as soon as its existence becomes known: 1 Stark. Ev. 114; 1 Greenl. Ev. 461. The introduction of the defendant afterwards cannot affect this case.

Per curiam.

Judgment affirmed.

Cited: S. v. Outerbridge, 82 N.C. 621; McCay, Ex parte, 84 N.C. 66;Armfield v. Colvert, 103 N.C. 155; Quinn v. Lattimore, 120 N.C. 433;Andrews v. Smith, 198 N.C. 36; Hayes v. Ricard, 244 N.C. 324.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Meroney v. . Avery, 64 N.C. 312 (N.C. 1870).

64 N.C. 312 (Meroney v. . Avery) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hayes v. Ricard
93 S.E.2d 540 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1956)
State v. . Outerbridge
82 N.C. 617 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1880)
Armfield v. . Colvert
9 S.E. 461 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1889)
State Ex Rel. Quinn v. Lattimore
26 S.E. 638 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1897)
In re Macay
84 N.C. 63 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1881)