Meroney v. Avery
64 N.C. 312
Opinion
The plaintiff was an incompetent witness to any transaction or communication with the testator of the defendant: C. C. P. § 343; Whitesides v. Green, Admr. decided at this term: hut the objection was waived, by not being taken in due time. An objection must be taken as soon as its existence becomes known: 1 Stark. Ev. 114; 1 Greenl. Ev. 461. The introduction of the defendant after-wards cannot affect this case.
Pee Curiam:. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Meroney v. Avery, 64 N.C. 312 (N.C. 1870).
64 N.C. 312 (Meroney v. Avery) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Setzer v. Boise Cascade Corp.
473 S.E.2d 431 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1996)
Etheridge v. Etheridge
255 S.E.2d 735 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1979)
Hayes v. Ricard
93 S.E.2d 540 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1956)
Andrews v. . Smith
150 S.E. 670 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1929)
State Ex Rel. Quinn v. Lattimore
26 S.E. 638 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1897)
Armfield v. . Colvert
9 S.E. 461 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1889)
MacAy Ex Parte
84 N.C. 63 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1881)
State v. . Outerbridge
82 N.C. 617 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1880)