Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Merino v. PennyMac Corp.

Merino v. PennyMac Corp.

225 So. 3d 329, 2017 WL 3160588, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 10664
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 26, 2017·No. No. 3D17-615·Published

Opinion

LOGUE, J.

Appellee, PennyMac Corp., filed the underlying foreclosure action against appellant, Claudia V. Merino. Following the denial of her motion to quash service of process, Ms. Merino appealed. After the briefing was completed, PennyMac filed a notice in this Court indicating that it voluntarily dismissed the underlying action without prejudice and filed a release of lis [330]*330pendens in the trial court. Ms. Merino has filed no response to this notice. In light of the fact that the underlying action has been voluntarily dismissed, we dismiss this appeal as moot.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Merino v. PennyMac Corp., 225 So. 3d 329, 2017 WL 3160588, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 10664 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

225 So. 3d 329 (Merino v. PennyMac Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.