Merino v. Pennymac Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 26, 2017·No. 17-0615·Published

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed July 26, 2017. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D17-615 Lower Tribunal No. 16-19504 ________________

Claudia V. Merino, Appellant,

vs.

PennyMac Corp., Appellee.

An Appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Peter R. Lopez, Judge.

Claudia V. Merino, in proper person.

McCalla Raymer Leibert Pierce, LLC, and Raymond Hora (Orlando), for appellee.

Before SUAREZ, LAGOA and LOGUE, JJ.

LOGUE, J. Appellee, PennyMac Corp., filed the underlying foreclosure action against

appellant, Claudia V. Merino. Following the denial of her motion to quash service

of process, Ms. Merino appealed. After the briefing was completed, PennyMac

filed a notice in this Court indicating that it voluntarily dismissed the underlying

action without prejudice and filed a release of lis pendens in the trial court. Ms.

Merino has filed no response to this notice. In light of the fact that the underlying

action has been voluntarily dismissed, we dismiss this appeal as moot.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Merino v. Pennymac Corp., (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Merino v. Pennymac Corp. (Merino v. Pennymac Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.