Merino v. PennyMac Corp.

225 So. 3d 329, 2017 WL 3160588, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 10664
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 26, 2017
DocketNo. 3D17-615
StatusPublished

This text of 225 So. 3d 329 (Merino v. PennyMac Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Merino v. PennyMac Corp., 225 So. 3d 329, 2017 WL 3160588, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 10664 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

LOGUE, J.

Appellee, PennyMac Corp., filed the underlying foreclosure action against appellant, Claudia V. Merino. Following the denial of her motion to quash service of process, Ms. Merino appealed. After the briefing was completed, PennyMac filed a notice in this Court indicating that it voluntarily dismissed the underlying action without prejudice and filed a release of lis [330]*330pendens in the trial court. Ms. Merino has filed no response to this notice. In light of the fact that the underlying action has been voluntarily dismissed, we dismiss this appeal as moot.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
225 So. 3d 329, 2017 WL 3160588, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 10664, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/merino-v-pennymac-corp-fladistctapp-2017.