Merges v. . Ringler
This text of 53 N.E. 1128 (Merges v. . Ringler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fvrst. The order is reviewable, and the motion to dismiss the appeal is denied.
All concur (Gray, J., upon the sole ground that since the cases of Holme v. Stewart [155 N. Y. 695], Smith v. Secor, and Kingsland v. Fuller [157 N. Y. 402 and 507], the question can no longer be deemed to be an open one, and that the court is committed to the view that such orders are final orders in special proceedings), except Parker, Ch. J., Martin and Vann, JJ., dissenting.
Second. On the merits, the order is affirmed on the opinion below, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
53 N.E. 1128, 158 N.Y. 701, 12 E.H. Smith 701, 1899 N.Y. LEXIS 791, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/merges-v-ringler-ny-1899.