Holme v. . Stewart
50 N.E. 1118, 155 N.Y. 695, 9 E.H. Smith 695, 1898 N.Y. LEXIS 1042
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur, except Parker, Ch. J., Gray and Martin, JJ., who dissent on the ground the question is not re viewable in this court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Holme v. . Stewart, 50 N.E. 1118, 155 N.Y. 695, 9 E.H. Smith 695, 1898 N.Y. LEXIS 1042 (N.Y. 1898).
50 N.E. 1118 (Holme v. . Stewart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Conlon v. . Kelly
92 N.E. 109 (New York Court of Appeals, 1910)
Parish v. . Parish
67 N.E. 298 (New York Court of Appeals, 1903)
Merges v. . Ringler
53 N.E. 1128 (New York Court of Appeals, 1899)