Merchants' & Farmers' Bank & Trust Co. v. Hammond Motors Co.

120 So. 586, 167 La. 889, 1929 La. LEXIS 1709
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedFebruary 11, 1929
DocketNo. 29254.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 120 So. 586 (Merchants' & Farmers' Bank & Trust Co. v. Hammond Motors Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Merchants' & Farmers' Bank & Trust Co. v. Hammond Motors Co., 120 So. 586, 167 La. 889, 1929 La. LEXIS 1709 (La. 1929).

Opinion

ROGERS, J.

The Merchante’ & Farmers’ Bank .& Trust Company, receiver of the Hammond Motors Company, Inc., filed its final account on December 22, 192,7. After listing the privilege debts, the accountant showed a balance of $11,115.01 for distribution among the ordinary creditors holding claims amounting to $37,592.93, thus disclosing the defendant corporation to be insolvent. Among the ordinary debts listed and acknowledged was $4,900 (on which the dividend was $1,448.44) due the Pointe Coupee Trust & Savings Bank. Several oppositions were filed to the account; three of the opponents opposing generally all the items thereon. On the trial of these oppositions, the court below ordered the debt of the Pointe Coupee Trust & Savings Bank stricken from the account, as not having been proven. The present devolutive appeal is from the judgment by the Pointe Coupee Trust & Savings Bank, in liquidation,-through J. S. Brock, state bank commissioner, and Ernest Morgan, its liquidator.

Opponents do not oppose' specifically appellant’s debt; their opposition thereto merely arises under the general clause in their respective oppositions indicating objection to the whole account.

The receiver acknowledged under oath appellant’s claim in its list of ordinary debts; therefore, quoad the receiver, the claim did not require other proof. On the trial of the oppositions, the receiver’s cashier and representative testified that, to the best of his knowledge, the account which was offered in evidence, was correct, and, in answer to a direct question, that the books of the defendant corporation showed an indebtedness to the appellant of $4,900. This evidence, which was received without objection, we think, made prima facie showing of the correctness of appellant’s claim. No countervailing testimony was offered by the opponents; hence this prima facie showing, on oppositions which were general and not specific, was sufficient proof of the debt due the appellant. *891 The court below erred, therefore, in striking that item from the receiver’s account.

For the reasons assigned, the judgment Appealed from is amended so as to recognize the Pointe Coupee Trust & Savings Bank, in liquidation as an ordinary creditor of the Hammond Motors Company, Inc., in the sum of $4,900, and, as such, entitled to its pro rata of the amount of $11,115.01 mentioned on the receiver’s account for distribution among the ordinary creditors of the defendant corporation, which amount the receiver of the Hammond Motors Company, Inc., is hereby ordered to pay to the liquidator of the Pointe Coupee Trust & Savings Bank; all costs of these proceedings to be paid by the receivership.

THOMPSON, J., takes no part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Merchants' & Farmers' Bank & Trust Co. v. Hammond Motors Co.
122 So. 869 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
120 So. 586, 167 La. 889, 1929 La. LEXIS 1709, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/merchants-farmers-bank-trust-co-v-hammond-motors-co-la-1929.