Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Mercer v. Planters Rice Mill Co.

Mercer v. Planters Rice Mill Co.

84 S.E. 492, 16 Ga. App. 38, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 494
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided February 18, 1915·No. 5634·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Wade, J.

There was no error in sustaining the demurrer, for it does not appear from the petition -that the efforts of the real-estate agent in securing the option resulted in procuring a purchaser ready, able, and willing to buy the real estate of the defendant.

Judgment affirmed,.

Broyles, J., not presiding. George W. Owens, T. P. Bavenel, E. S. Elliott, for defendant, cited: Humphries v. Smith, 5 Ga. App. 340, 343 (3); Larned v. Wentworth, 114 Ga. 208, 222; Hyams v. Miller, 71 Ga. 608, 618; Civil Code, § 3587; Harvil v. Wilson, 11 Ga. App. 156; Wilson v. Verner, 12 Ga App. 511; Jarman v. Westbrook, 134 Ga. 19; Terry v. Keim, 122 Ga. 43; Smith v. Tatum, 140 Ga. 719 (3a); Emery v. Atlanta Exchange, 88 Ga. 327; Payne v. Ponder, 139 Ga. 283, 287; Rice v. Ware, 3 Ga. App. 579.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mercer v. Planters Rice Mill Co., 84 S.E. 492, 16 Ga. App. 38, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 494 (Ga. Ct. App. 1915).

84 S.E. 492 (Mercer v. Planters Rice Mill Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Snead v. Wood
100 S.E. 714 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1919)