Mercer v. Planters Rice Mill Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Mercer v. Planters Rice Mill Co.

84 S.E. 492, 16 Ga. App. 38, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 494

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedFebruary 18, 1915

Docket5634

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 84 S.E. 492 (Mercer v. Planters Rice Mill Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mercer v. Planters Rice Mill Co., 84 S.E. 492, 16 Ga. App. 38, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 494 (Ga. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Wade, J.

There was no error in sustaining the demurrer, for it does not appear from the petition -that the efforts of the real-estate agent in securing the option resulted in procuring a purchaser ready, able, and willing to buy the real estate of the defendant.

Judgment affirmed,.

Broyles, J., not presiding. George W. Owens, T. P. Bavenel, E. S. Elliott, for defendant,

cited: Humphries v. Smith, 5 Ga. App. 340, 343 (3); Larned v. Wentworth, 114 Ga. 208, 222; Hyams v. Miller, 71 Ga. 608, 618; Civil Code, § 3587; Harvil v. Wilson, 11 Ga. App. 156; Wilson v. Verner, 12 Ga App. 511; Jarman v. Westbrook, 134 Ga. 19; Terry v. Keim, 122 Ga. 43; Smith v. Tatum, 140 Ga. 719 (3a); Emery v. Atlanta Exchange, 88 Ga. 327; Payne v. Ponder, 139 Ga. 283, 287; Rice v. Ware, 3 Ga. App. 579.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI