Mercer v. Hopper
212 S.E.2d 799, 233 Ga. 620, 1975 Ga. LEXIS 1392
Opinions
The controlling issue for decision in this habeas corpus appeal is whether the defendant was entitled to counsel at his probation revocation hearing.
This case is controlled by Reece v. Pettijohn, 229 Ga. 619 (193 SE2d 841), where this court, with two Justices dissenting, held adversely to appellant’s contention in this case. There is no right to counsel at a probation revocation hearing in Georgia.
The judgment of the habeas corpus trial court is correct and will be affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mercer v. Hopper, 212 S.E.2d 799, 233 Ga. 620, 1975 Ga. LEXIS 1392 (Ga. 1975).
212 S.E.2d 799 (Mercer v. Hopper) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Manville v. Hampton
471 S.E.2d 872 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1996)
Harris v. State
307 S.E.2d 504 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1983)
Parrish v. State
298 S.E.2d 558 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1982)
Flick v. State
285 S.E.2d 58 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1981)
Foskey v. Sapp
229 S.E.2d 635 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1976)
Hunter v. State
229 S.E.2d 505 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1976)
K. E. S. v. State
134 Ga. App. 843 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1975)
KES v. State of Ga.
216 S.E.2d 670 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1975)
Mercer v. Hopper
212 S.E.2d 799 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1975)