Mercer v. Hopper
This text of 212 S.E.2d 799 (Mercer v. Hopper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
The controlling issue for decision in this habeas corpus appeal is whether the defendant was entitled to counsel at his probation revocation hearing.
This case is controlled by Reece v. Pettijohn, 229 Ga. 619 (193 SE2d 841), where this court, with two Justices dissenting, held adversely to appellant’s contention in this case. There is no right to counsel at a probation revocation hearing in Georgia.
The judgment of the habeas corpus trial court is correct and will be affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
212 S.E.2d 799, 233 Ga. 620, 1975 Ga. LEXIS 1392, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mercer-v-hopper-ga-1975.