Mercer v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Mercer v. Commonwealth

346 S.W.2d 761, 1961 Ky. LEXIS 335

CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky

DecidedMay 19, 1961

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 346 S.W.2d 761 (Mercer v. Commonwealth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mercer v. Commonwealth, 346 S.W.2d 761, 1961 Ky. LEXIS 335 (Ky. Ct. App. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

BIRD, Chief Justice.

The trial court dismissed Gordon Mercer’s petition for writ of habeas corpus. He appeals.

He was convicted in the Jefferson Circuit Court under the Habitual Criminal Act, KRS 431.190. His punishment, was fixed at life imprisonment. Here, as in the trial court, he contends that the Habitual Criminal Act violates various provisions of both state and federal constitutions and that his imprisonment is therefore wrongful.

This Court has heretofore held that the act does not violate either constitution as claimed by him, or at all. For discussion of the same issues, see Allen v. Commonwealth, 272 Ky. 533, 114 S.W.2d 757; Ward v. Hurst, 300 Ky. 464, 189 S.W.2d 594; Hampton v. Whaley, 313 Ky. 611, 233 S.W. [762]*7622d 273; Harrod v. Whaley, Ky., 239 S.W.2d 480; Holt v. Commonwealth, Ky., 310 S.W.2d 40.

Having been indicted as an habitual criminal he further complains fhat he not only failed to have the psychiatric examination required by KRS 203.340 but that the statute was ignored in all respects. Our examination of the statute does not convince us that a trial is dependent upon compliance. Failure to comply does not void the judgment. We hold only void judgments are subject to attack by a habeas corpus proceeding. Fisher v. Commonwealth, Ky., 243 S.W.2d 881; Brown v. Commonwealth, Ky., 243 S.W.2d 885; Owen v. Commonwealth, Ky., 280 S.W.2d 524.

We find no error. The judgment is therefore afifirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BIRD, Chief Justice.

The trial court dismissed Gordon Mercer’s petition for writ of habeas corpus. He appeals.

He was convicted in the Jefferson Circuit Court under the Habitual Criminal Act, KRS 431.190. His punishment, was fixed at life imprisonment. Here, as in the trial court, he contends that the Habitual Criminal Act violates various provisions of both state and federal constitutions and that his imprisonment is therefore wrongful.

This Court has heretofore held that the act does not violate either constitution as claimed by him, or at all. For discussion of the same issues, see Allen v. Commonwealth, 272 Ky. 533, 114 S.W.2d 757; Ward v. Hurst, 300 Ky. 464, 189 S.W.2d 594; Hampton v. Whaley, 313 Ky. 611, 233 S.W. [762]*7622d 273; Harrod v. Whaley, Ky., 239 S.W.2d 480; Holt v. Commonwealth, Ky., 310 S.W.2d 40.

Having been indicted as an habitual criminal he further complains fhat he not only failed to have the psychiatric examination required by KRS 203.340 but that the statute was ignored in all respects. Our examination of the statute does not convince us that a trial is dependent upon compliance. Failure to comply does not void the judgment. We hold only void judgments are subject to attack by a habeas corpus proceeding. Fisher v. Commonwealth, Ky., 243 S.W.2d 881; Brown v. Commonwealth, Ky., 243 S.W.2d 885; Owen v. Commonwealth, Ky., 280 S.W.2d 524.

We find no error. The judgment is therefore afifirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

346 S.W.2d 761, 1961 Ky. LEXIS 335, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mercer-v-commonwealth-kyctapp-1961.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack