Lairson v. Commonwealth
This text of 388 S.W.2d 592 (Lairson v. Commonwealth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Buddy Lairson appeals from an order of the Clark Circuit Court which overruled, without a hearing or appointment of counsel, his motion under RCr 11.42 to vacate a judgment by which he was given a life sentence as an habitual criminal.
The grounds of the motion were (1) that the indictment was defective because it did not state the section number of the habitual criminal statute, and (2) the trial court did not give notice to che Commissioner of Mental Health as required by KRS 203.340.
Neither of these grounds is such as would warrant relief under RCr 11.42. As to the first ground, see Warner v. Commonwealth, Ky., 385 S.W.2d 77. As to the second ground see Mercer v. Commonwealth, Ky., 346 S.W.2d 761, and Etherton v. Commonwealth, Ky., 379 S.W.2d 730.
Since the motion showed on its face that there was no valid ground for relief, the movant was not entitled to a hearing or to appointment of counsel. Odewahn v. Commonwealth, Ky., 385 S.W.2d 163.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
388 S.W.2d 592, 1965 Ky. LEXIS 440, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lairson-v-commonwealth-kyctapp-1965.