Mercantile Trust Co. v. Chicago, P. & St. L. Ry. Co.

147 F. 699, 78 C.C.A. 87, 1906 U.S. App. LEXIS 4283
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
DecidedMay 1, 1906
DocketNo. 1,233
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 147 F. 699 (Mercantile Trust Co. v. Chicago, P. & St. L. Ry. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mercantile Trust Co. v. Chicago, P. & St. L. Ry. Co., 147 F. 699, 78 C.C.A. 87, 1906 U.S. App. LEXIS 4283 (7th Cir. 1906).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The only question is whether the report of the-master, on which the decree appealed from is based, is supported by sufficient evidence. On every material element of appellee’s case evidence was produced. The master was in the best position to-judge of the weight and credibility of the testimony given orally before him, and his finding, approved by the Circuit Court, should not be disturbed by us, unless it appears that an obvious mistake was made in the consideration of the evidence. Crawford v. Neal, 144 U. S. 585, 12 Sup. Ct. 759, 36 L. Ed. 552. So far from this being true,, we are satisfied that the finding was amply justified by the record.

The decree is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Midland Bridge Co. v. Houston & B. V. Ry. Co.
268 F. 931 (Fifth Circuit, 1920)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
147 F. 699, 78 C.C.A. 87, 1906 U.S. App. LEXIS 4283, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mercantile-trust-co-v-chicago-p-st-l-ry-co-ca7-1906.