Mercadante v. City of Paterson
275 A.2d 440, 58 N.J. 112
Opinion
THOMAS M. MERCADANTE AND MARIO OPROMOLLO, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
THE CITY OF PATERSON, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, AND THE BOARD OF POLICE AND FIRE COMMISSIONERS OF THE CITY OF PATERSON, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Mr. Abram A. Lebson argued the cause for the appellants (Messrs. Lebson & Prigoff, attorneys).
Mr. Joseph L. Conn, City Counsel, argued the cause for the respondents (Messrs. Joseph A. LaCava and Willian A. Feldman, on the brief).
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed essentially for the reasons expressed by Judge Mountain in the Chancery Division, 111 N.J. Super. 35 (1970).
For affirmance Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL and SCHETTINO 6.
For reversal None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mercadante v. City of Paterson, 275 A.2d 440, 58 N.J. 112 (N.J. 1971).
275 A.2d 440 (Mercadante v. City of Paterson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services
9 A.3d 882 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2010)
In Re Leary
450 A.2d 504 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1982)
Ector v. City of Torrance
514 P.2d 433 (California Supreme Court, 1973)