Menuskin v. Williams

98 F.3d 1342, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 41014, 1996 WL 580436
CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit
DecidedOctober 8, 1996
Docket96-6231
StatusUnpublished

This text of 98 F.3d 1342 (Menuskin v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Menuskin v. Williams, 98 F.3d 1342, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 41014, 1996 WL 580436 (1st Cir. 1996).

Opinion

98 F.3d 1342

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Max W. MENUSKIN; Sarah H. Newman; C.E. Barnes; Bess
Barnes; Elizabeth S. Wynn; Lew Phillips; Mamie
Phillips; Ed Merritt; Judie Merritt,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Don WILLIAMS; Alice Williams; First American National
Bank, Defendants.
Vicki Cooke; Cathleen N. Miles; Susan Parker; National
Title Insurance Agency; J.P. Sartain, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 96-6231.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Oct. 8, 1996.

E.D.Tenn., No. 92-00144; Curtis L. Collier, Judge.

E.D.Tenn., 1996 WL 549322.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

Before: KRUPANSKY, BOGGS, and SILER, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

This is a civil action arising from the sale of properties subject to undisclosed construction liens. On July 31, 1996, the district court granted the motions for summary judgment filed by defendants Cooke, Miles, Parker, Sartain, and National Title Insurance Agency. The plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal from that order and the present appeal resulted. We conclude we lack appellate jurisdiction in this case.

Absent certification for an interlocutory appeal under Rule 54(b), Fed.R.Civ.P., an order disposing of fewer than all parties or claims in an action is nonappealable. William B. Tanner Co. v. United States, 575 F.2d 101, 102 (6th Cir.1978) (per curiam). In this case, the district court did not adjudicate the claims against defendants Don Williams and Alice Williams and expressly stated such in its order of July 31, 1996.* Although the plaintiffs sought certification of that order for an interlocutory appeal under Rule 54(b), the district court denied such certification in an order of September 11, 1996.

It therefore is ORDERED that this appeal is dismissed sua sponte for lack of appellate jurisdiction.

*

Defendant First American National Bank was dismissed from the action on September 11, 1992

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

William B. Tanner Company, Inc. v. United States
575 F.2d 101 (Sixth Circuit, 1978)
Menuskin v. Williams
940 F. Supp. 1199 (E.D. Tennessee, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
98 F.3d 1342, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 41014, 1996 WL 580436, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/menuskin-v-williams-ca1-1996.