Menken v. Atlanta
131 U.S. 405, 9 S. Ct. 794, 1889 U.S. LEXIS 1832
Opinion
The death of Fritz Menken, the plaintiff in error in the cause having been suggested by Mr. Pope Barrow, in behalf of Mr. Hoke Smith of counsel for the said plaintiff in error, and it appearing to the court that this is a criminal case, it is considered by the court that this cause has abated. Therefore, it is ordered and adjudged by the court that the writ of error in this cause be, and the same is hereby,
Dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Menken v. Atlanta, 131 U.S. 405, 9 S. Ct. 794, 1889 U.S. LEXIS 1832 (1889).
131 U.S. 405 (Menken v. Atlanta) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Surland v. State
895 A.2d 1034 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2006)
United States v. Rorie
58 M.J. 399 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2003)
United States v. Parsons
367 F.3d 409 (Fifth Circuit, 2002)
United States v. Estate of Parsons ex rel. Millar
314 F.3d 745 (Fifth Circuit, 2002)
Swanson v. West
13 Vet. App. 197 (Veterans Claims, 1999)
Dorothy Crooker v. United States
325 F.2d 318 (Eighth Circuit, 1963)
Robinson v. California
371 U.S. 905 (Supreme Court, 1962)
Wetzel v. Ohio
371 U.S. 62 (Supreme Court, 1962)
Frank v. State
56 A.2d 810 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1948)
Singer v. United States
323 U.S. 338 (Supreme Court, 1945)
Pino v. United States
278 F. 479 (Seventh Circuit, 1921)
State v. Furth
144 P. 907 (Washington Supreme Court, 1914)
United States v. Dunne
173 F. 254 (Ninth Circuit, 1909)