Menken v. Atlanta

Supreme Court

Menken v. Atlanta

131 U.S. 405, 9 S. Ct. 794, 1889 U.S. LEXIS 1832

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedApril 18, 1889

Docket674

StatusPublished

Cited by17 cases

This text of 131 U.S. 405 (Menken v. Atlanta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Menken v. Atlanta, 131 U.S. 405, 9 S. Ct. 794, 1889 U.S. LEXIS 1832 (1889).

Pincite

Opinion

Per curiam:

The death of Fritz Menken, the plaintiff in error in the cause having been suggested by Mr. Pope Barrow, in behalf of Mr. Hoke Smith of counsel for the said plaintiff in error, and it appearing to the court that this is a criminal case, it is considered by the court that this cause has abated. Therefore, it is ordered and adjudged by the court that the writ of error in this cause be, and the same is hereby,

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per curiam:

The death of Fritz Menken, the plaintiff in error in the cause having been suggested by Mr. Pope Barrow, in behalf of Mr. Hoke Smith of counsel for the said plaintiff in error, and it appearing to the court that this is a criminal case, it is considered by the court that this cause has abated. Therefore, it is ordered and adjudged by the court that the writ of error in this cause be, and the same is hereby,

Dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

131 U.S. 405, 9 S. Ct. 794, 1889 U.S. LEXIS 1832, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/menken-v-atlanta-scotus-1889.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack