Menechino v. Division of Parole
This text of 258 N.E.2d 84 (Menechino v. Division of Parole) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[838]*838Order affirmed, without costs, in the following memorandum: The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs, on the sole ground that the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLB article 78 was barred by the four-months period of limitation prescribed (CPLB 217). The court did not reach or consider the petitioner’s argument that he had a constitutional right to be represented by counsel in a parole revocation proceeding. Our determination is, however, without prejudice to any other proceeding which the petitioner may be advised to institute.
Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Breitel, Jasen and Gibson.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
258 N.E.2d 84, 26 N.Y.2d 837, 309 N.Y.S.2d 585, 1970 N.Y. LEXIS 1494, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/menechino-v-division-of-parole-ny-1970.