Mendoza v. Travis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Mendoza v. Travis

306 A.D.2d 724, 760 N.Y.S.2d 898, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7163

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 19, 2003

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 306 A.D.2d 724 (Mendoza v. Travis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mendoza v. Travis, 306 A.D.2d 724, 760 N.Y.S.2d 898, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7163 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Benza, J.), entered August 30, 2002 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Board of Parole denying petitioner’s request for parole release.

Petitioner has reappeared before the Board of Parole since the February 2001 parole release determination giving rise to this proceeding and his request for parole release has again been denied. Given petitioner’s subsequent appearance before the Board in February 2003, the instant matter is now moot and must be dismissed (see Matter of Davis v Keane, 290 AD2d 763 [2002]).

[725]*725Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Peters, Spain and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Benza, J.), entered August 30, 2002 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Board of Parole denying petitioner’s request for parole release.

Petitioner has reappeared before the Board of Parole since the February 2001 parole release determination giving rise to this proceeding and his request for parole release has again been denied. Given petitioner’s subsequent appearance before the Board in February 2003, the instant matter is now moot and must be dismissed (see Matter of Davis v Keane, 290 AD2d 763 [2002]).

[725]*725Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Peters, Spain and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

306 A.D.2d 724, 760 N.Y.S.2d 898, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7163, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mendoza-v-travis-nyappdiv-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack