Davis v. Keane

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Davis v. Keane

290 A.D.2d 763, 735 N.Y.S.2d 832, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 411

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 17, 2002

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 290 A.D.2d 763 (Davis v. Keane) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Davis v. Keane, 290 A.D.2d 763, 735 N.Y.S.2d 832, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 411 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (LaBuda, J.), entered April 10, 2001 in Sullivan County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Board of Parole denying petitioner’s request for parole release.

Petitioner has reappeared before the Board of Parole since the parole release determination giving rise to this proceeding and his request for parole release has again been denied. Given petitioner’s subsequent appearance before the Board, the instant matter is now moot and must be dismissed (see, Matter of Bermudez v New York State Div. of Parole, 281 AD2d 673).

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Crew III, Peters and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (LaBuda, J.), entered April 10, 2001 in Sullivan County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Board of Parole denying petitioner’s request for parole release.

Petitioner has reappeared before the Board of Parole since the parole release determination giving rise to this proceeding and his request for parole release has again been denied. Given petitioner’s subsequent appearance before the Board, the instant matter is now moot and must be dismissed (see, Matter of Bermudez v New York State Div. of Parole, 281 AD2d 673).

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Crew III, Peters and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

290 A.D.2d 763, 735 N.Y.S.2d 832, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 411, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-keane-nyappdiv-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack