Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Mendoza v. State

Mendoza v. State

146 So. 3d 138, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 13712, 2014 WL 4346395
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Mendoza v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 3171 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 3, 2014·No. No. 3D14-228·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed without prejudice. See Casteel v. State, 141 So.3d 624 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014) (affirming without prejudice for appellant to file a sworn and legally sufficient motion under Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.801).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mendoza v. State, 146 So. 3d 138, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 13712, 2014 WL 4346395 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

146 So. 3d 138 (Mendoza v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Casteel v. State
141 So. 3d 624 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)