Mendoza v. State

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Mendoza v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 3171
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 23, 2014·No. 13-1366·Published

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed July 23, 2014. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D13-1366 Lower Tribunal No. 02-16949B ________________

Salvador Mendoza, Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida, Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Stacy D. Glick, Judge.

Salvador Mendoza, in proper person.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before LAGOA, SALTER and EMAS, JJ.

PER CURIAM. Salvador Mendoza appeals an order barring him from filing further post-

conviction motions in the lower tribunal case unless any such motion is signed by a

member in good standing of The Florida Bar. The notice of appeal filed by

Mendoza indicates that he is also attempting to appeal an order (entered over two

months before the bar order) denying his motion under Florida Rule of Criminal

Procedure 3.800. Any such attempt was untimely and would have been subject to

dismissal for lack of jurisdiction. Treating Mendoza’s notice of appeal and

amended brief as a petition for belated appeal, however, we have considered the

merits of his arguments under Rule 3.800. Finding no merit, we affirm both of the

orders sought to be reviewed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mendoza v. State, (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Mendoza v. State (Mendoza v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.