Mendoza v. State

50 So. 3d 784, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 19813, 2010 WL 5346554
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Mendoza v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 3171
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 29, 2010·No. 3D08-2750·Published

Opinion

ROTHENBERG, J.

The defendant, Francisco Mendoza, appeals his conviction for aggravated battery, as a lesser included offense of attempted first-degree premeditated murder on the basis that the information did not plead the necessary elements of aggravated battery. Although we conclude that the argument raised on appeal was not preserved for appellate review, we also find no merit to the argument raised. See Washington v. State, 912 So.2d 344, 346 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) (holding that the allegation that the defendant discharged a firearm sufficiently alleged the use of a deadly weapon, and thus, the charging document contained the requisite elements of attempted aggravated battery); Bell v. State, 394 So.2d 570, 571 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981) (finding that aggravated battery was properly charged as a lesser included offense of attempted first-degree murder where the information alleged that the defendant did shoot the victim with a firearm).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mendoza v. State, 50 So. 3d 784, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 19813, 2010 WL 5346554 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

50 So. 3d 784 (Mendoza v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bell v. State
394 So. 2d 570 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Washington v. State
912 So. 2d 344 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)