Washington v. State
This text of 890 So. 2d 1276 (Washington v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Harry L. WASHINGTON, III, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Harry L. Washington, III, Bushnell, pro se.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Lamya A. Henry, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Appellant challenges an order denying his motion for jail credit made pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). The lower court denied Appellant's motion without attaching documents establishing that appellant is not entitled to the credit. The State concedes error on *1277 this point. See Crawford v. State, 823 So.2d 832 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002).
The order of the trial court is reversed, and this cause is remanded with instructions to the trial court to either grant the relief or attach portions of the record that support the denial of relief.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
PLEUS, PALMER and TORPY, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
890 So. 2d 1276, 2005 WL 119740, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/washington-v-state-fladistctapp-2005.