Mendoza-Martinez v. Mackey

238 F.2d 239
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided November 2, 1956·No. No. 14997·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Mendoza-Martinez appeals from an adverse judgment in an action for declaratory judgment in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, Northern Division.

Appellant departed the United States in 1942 for Mexico and remained there until 1946. Upon his return to the United States, he was convicted for draft evasion under 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 311.1 While in custody, appellant was arrested by the Immigration and Naturalization Service for illegal entry; the warrant alleged expatriation under Sec. 401 (j) of the Nationality Act of 1940, 54 Stat. 1168 (1940), as amended by 58 Stat. 746 (1944).2 The statute provided, in substance, for loss of United States nationality by departing from or remaining outside United States jurisdiction during a national emergency for the purpose of evading or avoiding military service.

After exhausting administrative remedies, appellant brought this action for declaratory relief. Appellant’s sole contention is that Sec. 401(j) is unconstitutional. This Court has twice held said section to be constitutional; on authority of Gonzalez v. Landon, 9 Cir., 1954, 215 F.2d 955, reversed on other grounds 350 U.S. 920, 76 S.Ct. 210, and Vidales v. Brownell, 9 Cir., 1954, 217 F.2d 136, the judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mendoza-Martinez v. Mackey, 238 F.2d 239 (9th Cir. 1956).

238 F.2d 239 (Mendoza-Martinez v. Mackey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cort v. Herter
187 F. Supp. 683 (District of Columbia, 1960)
Mendoza-Martinez v. MacKey
238 F.2d 239 (Ninth Circuit, 1956)