Mendez v. United States

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedApril 21, 2005
Docket05-6239
StatusUnpublished

This text of Mendez v. United States (Mendez v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mendez v. United States, (4th Cir. 2005).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6239

RAPHAEL MENDEZ,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; BUTNER FEDERAL MEDICAL CENTER,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief District Judge. (CA-04-90)

Submitted: April 14, 2005 Decided: April 21, 2005

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Raphael Mendez, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Raphael Mendez appeals a district court order and

judgment denying his petition for writ of habeas corpus filed under

28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and the

district court’s order and affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. See Mendez v. United States, CA-04-90 (E.D.N.C.

Jan. 4, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Power to grant writ
28 U.S.C. § 2241

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Mendez v. United States, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mendez-v-united-states-ca4-2005.