Mendez v. United States
Opinion
Raphael Mendez appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil rights complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Mendez v. United States, No. CA-03-747-5-H (E.D.N.C. Oct. 29, 2003). The motion for refund of money withheld from appellant’s trust account under the Prison Litigation Reform Act is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
94 F. App'x 987 (Mendez v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.