Mendez v. United States
This text of Mendez v. United States (Mendez v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-7800
RAPHAEL MENDEZ,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, J. T. HADDEN, Warden; KEVIN J. MCBRIDE, PhD., A. F. BEELER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcom J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-03-747-5-H)
Submitted: April 15, 2004 Decided: April 22, 2004
Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Raphael Mendez, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Raphael Mendez appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his civil rights complaint. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. See Mendez v. United States,
No. CA-03-747-5-H (E.D.N.C. Oct. 29, 2003). The motion for refund
of money withheld from appellant’s trust account under the Prison
Litigation Reform Act is denied. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Mendez v. United States, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mendez-v-united-states-ca4-2004.