Mendelson v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Mendelson v. United States

56 Cust. Ct. 833, 1966 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1990

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedMarch 29, 1966

DocketV.D. 131; Entry No. 13961, etc.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 56 Cust. Ct. 833 (Mendelson v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mendelson v. United States, 56 Cust. Ct. 833, 1966 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1990 (cusc 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

Wilson, Judge:

This matter is before me on remand from classification proceedings decided by the first division of this court in Felix M. Mendelson and Hoyt, Shepston & Sciaroni v. United States, 40 Cust. Ct. 415, Abstract 61463. By the judgment therein and under the terms of the statute (28 U.S.C. § 2636(d)), the matter was remanded to a single judge for determination of the value of the merchandise in the manner provided by law. The proceeding has been abandoned by counsel for the importer. It is, therefore, dismissed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilson, Judge:

This matter is before me on remand from classification proceedings decided by the first division of this court in Felix M. Mendelson and Hoyt, Shepston & Sciaroni v. United States, 40 Cust. Ct. 415, Abstract 61463. By the judgment therein and under the terms of the statute (28 U.S.C. § 2636(d)), the matter was remanded to a single judge for determination of the value of the merchandise in the manner provided by law. The proceeding has been abandoned by counsel for the importer. It is, therefore, dismissed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

56 Cust. Ct. 833, 1966 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1990, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mendelson-v-united-states-cusc-1966.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack