Mendelsohn v. Walpin
This text of 94 N.E.2d 254 (Mendelsohn v. Walpin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the Matter of Louis A. Mendelsohn, Respondent,
v.
Bernard G. Walpin, Appellant, and Harry B. Chambers, as Chairman of the Bronx County Committee of The Democratic Party, et al., Respondents.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
Stanley Goldstein for appellant.
Arnold L. Fein for Americans for Democratic Action, amicus curiæ, in support of appellant's position.
Joseph A. Brust for Louis A. Mendelsohn, respondent.
John L. Flynn and Alfred J. Callahan for Harry B. Chambers, respondent.
John P. McGrath, Corporation Counsel (Thomas W. A. Crowe of counsel), for Board of Elections of the City of New York, respondent.
Concur: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND, FULD and FROESSEL, JJ. Taking no part: DYE, J.
Order affirmed; no opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
94 N.E.2d 254, 301 N.Y. 670, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mendelsohn-v-walpin-ny-1950.