Menasha Corp. v. Crawford

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Menasha Corp. v. Crawford

988 P.2d 451, 164 Or. App. 174

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedNovember 10, 1999

Docket98-03327 CA A105040

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 988 P.2d 451 (Menasha Corp. v. Crawford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Menasha Corp. v. Crawford, 988 P.2d 451, 164 Or. App. 174 (Or. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

988 P.2d 451 (1999) 164 Or. App. 174

In the Matter of the Compensation of Garrett W. Crawford, Claimant.
MENASHA CORPORATION and Lumbermans Mutual Casualty Company, Petitioners,
v.
Garrett W. CRAWFORD, Respondent.

(98-03327; CA A105040)

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted October 14, 1999. Decided November 10, 1999.

Jerald P. Keene argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioners.

Michael Stebbins, North Bend, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent.

Before EDMONDS, Presiding Judge, and ARMSTRONG and KISTLER, Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Reversed and remanded for reconsideration in light of Fred Meyer, Inc. v. Bundy, 159 Or.App. 44, 978 P.2d 385, rev. allowed 329 Or. 318 (1999).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

988 P.2d 451 (1999) 164 Or. App. 174

In the Matter of the Compensation of Garrett W. Crawford, Claimant.
MENASHA CORPORATION and Lumbermans Mutual Casualty Company, Petitioners,
v.
Garrett W. CRAWFORD, Respondent.

(98-03327; CA A105040)

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted October 14, 1999. Decided November 10, 1999.

Jerald P. Keene argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioners.

Michael Stebbins, North Bend, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent.

Before EDMONDS, Presiding Judge, and ARMSTRONG and KISTLER, Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Reversed and remanded for reconsideration in light of Fred Meyer, Inc. v. Bundy, 159 Or.App. 44, 978 P.2d 385, rev. allowed 329 Or. 318 (1999).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

988 P.2d 451, 164 Or. App. 174, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/menasha-corp-v-crawford-orctapp-1999.

Opinion

In the Matter of the Compensation of Garrett W. Crawford, Claimant. MENASHA CORPORATION and Lumbermans Mutual Casualty Company, Petitioners, v. Garrett W. CRAWFORD, Respondent.

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

In the Matter of the Compensation of Garrett W. Crawford, Claimant.
MENASHA CORPORATION and Lumbermans Mutual Casualty Company, Petitioners,
v.
Garrett W. CRAWFORD, Respondent.