Melzer v. Robbins
454 N.E.2d 124, 60 N.Y.2d 582, 467 N.Y.S.2d 43, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3300
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs, for the reason stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (92 AD2d 540; see, also, Di Falco, Field & Lomenzo v Newburgh Dyeing Corp., 54 NY2d 715; Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557).
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer and Simons.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Melzer v. Robbins, 454 N.E.2d 124, 60 N.Y.2d 582, 467 N.Y.S.2d 43, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3300 (N.Y. 1983).
454 N.E.2d 124 (Melzer v. Robbins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Woodrow v. Sisson
154 A.D.2d 829 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)