Melzer v. Robbins
This text of 454 N.E.2d 124 (Melzer v. Robbins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs, for the reason stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (92 AD2d 540; see, also, Di Falco, Field & Lomenzo v Newburgh Dyeing Corp., 54 NY2d 715; Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557).
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer and Simons.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
454 N.E.2d 124, 60 N.Y.2d 582, 467 N.Y.S.2d 43, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3300, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/melzer-v-robbins-ny-1983.