Di Falco, Field & Lomenzo v. Newburgh Dyeing Corp.
426 N.E.2d 484, 54 N.Y.2d 715, 442 N.Y.S.2d 990, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2639
This text of 426 N.E.2d 484 (Di Falco, Field & Lomenzo v. Newburgh Dyeing Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Di Falco, Field & Lomenzo v. Newburgh Dyeing Corp., 426 N.E.2d 484, 54 N.Y.2d 715, 442 N.Y.S.2d 990, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2639 (N.Y. 1981).
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On summary consideration, order affirmed, with costs. Defendant failed to make an evidentiary showing sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact.
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
New York Surety Co. v. Costello
245 A.D.2d 352 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Melzer v. Robbins
454 N.E.2d 124 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
426 N.E.2d 484, 54 N.Y.2d 715, 442 N.Y.S.2d 990, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2639, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/di-falco-field-lomenzo-v-newburgh-dyeing-corp-ny-1981.