Di Falco, Field & Lomenzo v. Newburgh Dyeing Corp.
426 N.E.2d 484, 54 N.Y.2d 715, 442 N.Y.S.2d 990, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2639
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On summary consideration, order affirmed, with costs. Defendant failed to make an evidentiary showing sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact.
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Di Falco, Field & Lomenzo v. Newburgh Dyeing Corp., 426 N.E.2d 484, 54 N.Y.2d 715, 442 N.Y.S.2d 990, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2639 (N.Y. 1981).
426 N.E.2d 484 (Di Falco, Field & Lomenzo v. Newburgh Dyeing Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
New York Surety Co. v. Costello
245 A.D.2d 352 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Melzer v. Robbins
454 N.E.2d 124 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)