Melvin v. State

912 So. 2d 380, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 16286, 2005 WL 2511335
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 12, 2005
DocketNos. 3D04-1599, 3D05-0097
StatusPublished

This text of 912 So. 2d 380 (Melvin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Melvin v. State, 912 So. 2d 380, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 16286, 2005 WL 2511335 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Frederick Melvin appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion to withdraw his plea, alleging he was entitled to conflict-free counsel. We affirm the denial, finding the trial court did not abuse its discretion. State v. Wiita, 744 So.2d 1232 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999).

The court conducted an extensive plea colloquy, and the record shows that the defendant agreed to have defense counsel appointed for the sole purpose of entering his plea. The defendant’s right to effective representation at this critical stage in the proceedings was not adversely affected. Cunningham v. State, 677 So.2d 929 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996). We affirm as to all other issues.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cunningham v. State
677 So. 2d 929 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
State v. Wiita
744 So. 2d 1232 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
912 So. 2d 380, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 16286, 2005 WL 2511335, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/melvin-v-state-fladistctapp-2005.