Melvin v. State
837 So. 2d 1172, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 2157, 2003 WL 470239
Opinion
We affirm Appellant’s conviction and sentence for driving while her license was revoked as a habitual offender, contrary to section 322.34(5), see State v. Craycraft, 817 So.2d 864 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002); Serra v. State, 835 So.2d 1277 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003), but remand for the trial court to correct the disposition order and the adjudication withheld order to reflect that Appellant entered a no contest plea, not a guilty plea.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Melvin v. State, 837 So. 2d 1172, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 2157, 2003 WL 470239 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).
837 So. 2d 1172 (Melvin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Craycraft
817 So. 2d 864 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Serra v. State
835 So. 2d 1277 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)