Melvin C. Perkins v. Preston M. Banster and W. A. Ard
285 F.2d 426
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 28, 1960·No. 8228_1·Published·Cited by 10 cases
Opinion
After hearing plaintiff’s appeal from an order dismissing the proceedings as frivolous, we affirm for the same reason and refer for details to the opinion of the District Court, 190 F.Supp. 98 (Md., 1960).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Melvin C. Perkins v. Preston M. Banster and W. A. Ard, 285 F.2d 426 (4th Cir. 1960).
285 F.2d 426 (Melvin C. Perkins v. Preston M. Banster and W. A. Ard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Boddorff v. Publicker Industries, Inc.
488 F. Supp. 1107 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1980)
Shore v. Howard
414 F. Supp. 379 (N.D. Texas, 1976)
Stewart v. New York University
430 F. Supp. 1305 (S.D. New York, 1976)
Spiess v. C. Itoh & Co.(America), Inc.
408 F. Supp. 916 (S.D. Texas, 1976)
L. N. McDONALD and Raymond Laird, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. the SANTE FE TRAIL TRANSPORTATION COMPANY Et Al., Defendants-Appellees
513 F.2d 90 (Fifth Circuit, 1975)
Hollander v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
392 F. Supp. 90 (D. Connecticut, 1975)
Van Hoomissen v. Xerox Corporation
368 F. Supp. 829 (N.D. California, 1973)
McIntosh v. Garofalo
367 F. Supp. 501 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1973)
Ripp v. Dobbs Houses, Inc.
366 F. Supp. 205 (N.D. Alabama, 1973)
Marshall v. Plumbers and Steamfitters Local Union 60
343 F. Supp. 70 (E.D. Louisiana, 1972)