L. N. McDONALD and Raymond Laird, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. the SANTE FE TRAIL TRANSPORTATION COMPANY Et Al., Defendants-Appellees

513 F.2d 90, 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 14596, 9 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 10,161, 10 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1165
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedMay 21, 1975
Docket74-2813
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 513 F.2d 90 (L. N. McDONALD and Raymond Laird, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. the SANTE FE TRAIL TRANSPORTATION COMPANY Et Al., Defendants-Appellees) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
L. N. McDONALD and Raymond Laird, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. the SANTE FE TRAIL TRANSPORTATION COMPANY Et Al., Defendants-Appellees, 513 F.2d 90, 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 14596, 9 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 10,161, 10 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1165 (5th Cir. 1975).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

42 U.S.C.A. § 1981 gives all persons within the jurisdiction of the United States the same right to equal benefit of the laws “as is enjoyed by white citizens.” The district court held that this section confers no actionable rights upon white persons, and dismissed for lack of jurisdiction the § 1981 claim brought by the two white plaintiffs. We affirm. Perkins v. Banster, 190 F.Supp. 98 (D.Md.), aff’d, 285 F.2d 426 (4th Cir. 1960); Kurylas v. U. S. Department of Agriculture, 373 F.Supp. 1072 (D.D.C.1974); Van Hoomissen v. Xerox Corp., 368 F.Supp. 829 (N.D.Cal.1973); Ripp v. Dobbs Houses, Inc., 366 F.Supp. 205 (N.D.Ala.1973). Contra, WRMA Broadcasting Co. v. Hawthorne, 365 F.Supp. 577 (M.D.Ala.1973); Gannon v. Action, 303 F.Supp. 1240 (E.D.Mo.1969), aff’d in part, remanded in part on other grounds, 450 F.2d 1227 (8th Cir. 1971); Central Presbyterian Church v. Black Liberation Front, 303 F.Supp. 894 (E.D.Mo.1969).

We likewise agree with the district court’s conclusion that an employer’s dismissal of white employees charged with misappropriating company property while not dismissing a similarly charged black employee does not raise a claim upon which relief may be granted under Title VII, 42 U.S.C.A. § 2000e et seq. There is no allegation that the plaintiffs were falsely charged. Discipli *91 nary action for offenses not constituting crimes is not involved in this case. See McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792, 93 S.Ct. 1817, 36 L.Ed.2d 668 (1973). Cf. NLRB v. Fansteel Metallurgical Corp., 306 U.S. 240, 59 S.Ct. 490, 83 L.Ed. 627 (1939); Nix v. NLRB, 418 F.2d 1001, 1006 (5th Cir. 1969); AHI Machine Tool & Die, Inc. v. NLRB, 432 F.2d 190 (6th Cir. 1970).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McDonald v. Santa Fe Trail Transportation Co.
427 U.S. 273 (Supreme Court, 1976)
Shore v. Howard
414 F. Supp. 379 (N.D. Texas, 1976)
Stewart v. New York University
430 F. Supp. 1305 (S.D. New York, 1976)
Sanford v. Howard University
415 F. Supp. 23 (District of Columbia, 1976)
Spiess v. C. Itoh & Co.(America), Inc.
408 F. Supp. 916 (S.D. Texas, 1976)
Board of Ed. of Atlanta v. AMERICAN FED. OF S., C. & ME
401 F. Supp. 687 (N.D. Georgia, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
513 F.2d 90, 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 14596, 9 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 10,161, 10 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1165, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/l-n-mcdonald-and-raymond-laird-plaintiffs-appellants-v-the-sante-fe-ca5-1975.